The Benicia Herald

Call us at 707-745-0733 (circulation 707-745-6838)

Council, EDB give OK to economic plan

with 13 comments

THE City Council and EDB met in a joint session Tuesday.
Donna Beth Weilenman/Staff

■ At joint session, panels approve effort to boost business

By Keri Luiz and Donna Beth Weilenman
Benicia Herald Staff

In a unanimous vote Tuesday night, the Benicia City Council and the city’s Economic Development Board accepted the draft of a business development action plan, and told city staff to have the plan ready to launch in 120 days.

The plan’s list of priorities include establishing a formal program to attract businesses to the city as well as keep and expand the companies already in Benicia; forming a task force to streamline the city’s permitting process; establishing an economic development website; and increasing the city’s economic development operations. The panels added one item: establishing performance measures.

Other priorities focused on the Benicia Industrial Park, which had been the subject of one common theme not only during Tuesday’s joint meeting but in earlier meetings of the EDB. That theme was that the Industrial Park, the biggest tax revenue generator, is in need of a lot of updating and fixing in order to draw in more businesses.

The launch schedule reflected that theme in several of its priorities: Determine incentive or investment options for the Benicia Industrial Park; work with AMPORTS, which operates the Port of Benicia, and CODA Automotive, the company that will assemble all-electric cars there, to see what ancillary businesses or services should be sought to meet their needs; and improve the Industrial Park’s infrastructure by repairing its damaged roads, rectifying conditions that lead to flooding, and installing broadband Internet service.

Audrey Taylor, president of Chabin Concepts, the consultant that produced the plan’s draft, led the presentation. It was a condensed version of the one she gave at an all-day confab at the Benicia Community Center on Oct. 12.

“I have to say, this is an historic moment in my career to have a joint meeting between the Economic Development Board and the Council,” Taylor said at the beginning of Tuesday’s joint meeting. “You should be very proud of this. You have taken this project very seriously.”

The 66-page document, which will undergo further refinement to include the suggestions of Council and EDB members, is a blueprint for Benicia’s economic development activities during the nex 18 to 36 months, with hopes of improving the city’s economic base and adding more jobs to improve residents’ own prosperity.

Chabin and its associates determined that this year, Benicia has spent 70 percent of its staff time and 81 percent of its economic development budget — $233,700 — on tourism and the encouragement of downtown business.

However, the city has two other revenue generators: its commercial areas outside the downtown district, and more significantly, the Industrial Park, which generates a total of $11,793,434 in total taxable sales revenue. (This is compared to $730,756 generated by downtown businesses and $1,458,578 from those in the city’s other commercial areas.)

The report urged the city to give more support to those two areas, a recommendation with which EDB Chairperson Christina Strawbridge, a downtown business owner, agreed.

There is a need for balance in the way the resources are spent between downtown, commercial and industrial, Taylor said. “You don’t want to stop doing the things that you’ve been doing in the downtown or the tourism, but you want to start balancing this out,” she said.

“For the last couple years you have put a lot of investment in your downtown and your tourism, and you should have. That was your priority in your 2007 economic development strategy plan.”

While there is a need to continue moving forward on downtown and tourism, there is also a great need to focus on the industrial area, she said.

“This is the economic generator for the city,” Taylor said. “And it needs to be vibrant.

“I don’t feel downtown is feeling, ‘You’re going take our money away.’ I hope the focus is on the Industrial Park.” She reminded the two panels that revenue from Industrial Park commerce benefits the area schools as well as other Benicia companies.

“It feeds us,” she said.

Jasmin Powell of Dunlop Manufacturing, an Industrial Park company, reminded the pair of panels that the Industrial Park “has no broadband, and the roads need help.”

In addition, she said she is worried about the threat of an order from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control that might require property owners to foot the bill to make sure the park, which sits on a former military arsenal site, is free of ordnance and hazardous chemicals.

“I don’t see money in the budget for Industrial Park infrastructure,” Powell said.

Taylor said the report didn’t cover that point, but said Industrial Park businesses need to help determine priorities “because the city can’t fund it all.”

But there are ways of finding funding, she said.

“One of the reasons to start your formal business retention program is to start to look for businesses that are expanding so that we can leverage funding from state and federal resources that can help.

“There’s always a kind of cause and effect that we’re looking for.”

Written by beniciaherald

October 26, 2011 at 5:45 pm

Posted in News

13 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Can you tell me after spending $233,700 on attracting tourism to the City of Benicia, what was the end results?

    Did it make a difference? That should be the bottom line, yes?

    Nadina Riggsbee

    October 26, 2011 at 5:57 pm

    • Nadina,
      I agree! We spent $233,000 to generate 1% of our Budget. Meanwhile, we spent nothing in the Benicia Business Park that generates some 70% of our Budget. We have no high speed internet. Industrial Way is under water half the year. The access to and from Highway 780 is horrible. We have a huge electronic billboard built by Nationwide Auctions that doesn’t work. We have over 20% vacancy. And, NOBODY is doing any sort of market research.
      You tell me what $233,000 is doing?
      Thanks,
      Rick

      Rick Ernst

      October 26, 2011 at 7:09 pm

  2. If Patterson loses the election, my guess is the Seeno family will be back and the focus will have to shift to the development of that property to keep pace with newer business parks we compete with.

    Carl Mann

    October 27, 2011 at 7:09 am

    • Of course Seeno will be back. Just like a great white shark can smell the blood of a injured person in the water and will be coming back for a meal. Hope that EP is re-elected so Seeno can swim in someone else’s pond for the next few years and stay out of Benicia waters unless Seeno will follow the General Plan guidelines and play fair!

      Benicia Mom

      October 27, 2011 at 1:28 pm

      • Everyone is missing the big picture. No-one, including Seeno, is going to invest in building a huge development of more industrial space across the street from an industrial park that has a 20% vacancy rate. All this hand wringing either way is almost silly. It’s economics, not poltics, that drives development.

        By the way Mr. Ernst, it is called the Benicia Industral Park. Benicia Business Park is the Seeno project.

        Benician

        October 27, 2011 at 3:38 pm

      • Mom, as I recall, Mr. Seeno and the city had reached a point where we had a project agreeable to all concerned parties. My view may be somewhat simplistic, but the fact is Seeno pulled out at the last minute over some gripe about Mayor Patterson. It is very dramatic to equate Mr. Seeno to a shark, but we have plenty of staff and citizen groups with an eye on what is going to happen out there. I don’t see us as being exposed to any shenanigans if Mr. Seeno returns only if Elizabeth Patterson is gone, and many feel as I do that he will continue to graze cattle until that time. I think Mayor Patterson is well meaning, but she is viewed by many as a green extremist regarding business growth in our city.

        Carl Mann

        October 27, 2011 at 3:49 pm

  3. Seeno did follow the general plan. Backed away when Mayor Patterson made her comments. Read the letter. The final draft that Seeno did not sign after her comments the mayor had agreed to. So you could say the mayor failed the city.

    alhambra15Bob Livesay

    October 27, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    • Yes, read the letter. You could say the mayor failed the city. Or you could say she saved it. We know the way Bob sees it, but we also know all too well how skewed and distorted his worldview is.

      Mike

      October 27, 2011 at 4:00 pm

      • why don’t you tell us about your worldview “MIKE”? Why don’t you start by telling us about your credentials? Let us know what background you have in anything, accept for sitting at that keyboard and running down others, who happen to be ten times as qualified to speak on nearly all subjects. Why dont you fill us in MIKE? Who is “Mike”?

        Jim Pugh

        October 28, 2011 at 10:33 am

      • Who are you again?

        Mike

        October 28, 2011 at 11:36 am

  4. Saved the city? From what Mike, everyone was on the same page about the project. Is this NOT true?

    Carl Mann

    October 27, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    • How did they get to that same page? Have you not read Marilyn’s and Jerome Page’s excellent columns on the subject? If the deal Elizabeth Patterson helped create — that is, led on — is the starting point when and if Seeno returns, then she did indeed save the city. She saved it from a much worse deal, probably a disastrous one. The kind communities all over this state and Nevada have suffered from. Do your homework, and don’t be so eager to welcome a disreputable “developer” into our town.

      Mike

      October 27, 2011 at 5:03 pm

  5. Here is a link to the most recent wind energy project in Solano County.
    http://solanocountybusinessnews.blogspot.com/
    There is no good reason to not implement our strategy of a wind energy micro-utility north of Lake Herman Road. This would serve interests in both business recruitment and tourism, in my opinion.

    Windjammer

    October 29, 2011 at 7:21 am


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,978 other followers

%d bloggers like this: